Stay up to date with the latest intellectual property developments from New Zealand and around the world.
Judge Allows Patent Divisional Deadline Reprieve But Legislative Change Preferable
A recent High Court decision provides some hope to applicant’s who seek to correct an error when their patent application missed a deadline due to no fault of their own.
Tom Robertson is a senior member of Pipers' IP team with a deep understanding of, and decades of experience in, patents, trade marks, and design law. His extensive practice spans the agricultural, viticultural, mechanical, and electrical sectors, as well as a strong background in trade mark law and IP searching.
Some of Tom’s career highlights include his role as an Examiner at IPONZ, where he played a part in advising on the drafting of New Zealand’s Trade Marks Act 2002, and his significant experience with Australian IP law garnered from his time in our firm’s former Brisbane Office.
A Registered Patent and Trade Mark Attorney, Tom also serves as the current President of the New Zealand Intellectual Property Attorneys Inc. (NZIPA). At Pipers IP, Tom helps to drive innovation and delivers outstanding results for our clients.
No Elbow Room Given for Resmed’s Broad Nasal Mask System Claims
In Resmed Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Patents [2024] NZHC 1881 Resmed’s appeal concerning the claims of its nasal mask system was unsuccessful. The High Court of New Zealand upheld the Assistant Commissioner’s finding that the claims were not fairly based on the patent specification.
The Cost of Trade Mark Non-Use – Duelling Over Crocodile Marks Continues
In Lacoste v Crocodile International Pte Limited 2024 NZHC 1333 the Judge confirmed that pleading non-use puts both genuine use and use as a trade mark in issue and that pleading non-use in respect of all goods and/or services does not preclude a finding of partial revocation.