CAFC Provides Pertinent Guidance on Criteria for Analogous Prior Art
11th December 2020
In Donner Technology LLC v Pro Stage Gear LLC 20-1104 the US Court of Appeal for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) clarified the approach to considering analogous art in relation to obviousness determinations.
Read more
Management of Your IP
11th December 2020
It is best if all your IP is under the watchful eye of one firm of attorneys.
Read more
Nothing But Foreign Reputation Insufficient for Opposition
8th December 2020
In Kiwi Fresh Orange Company Limited v Monde Nissin (Australia) Pty Ltd 2020 NZIPOTM 26 , despite spill-over reputation from the Australian market, the Assistant Commissioner declined to find a likelihood of deception or confusion due to the low distinctiveness of Monde Nissin’s marks.
Read more
First Reading for AU Designs Amendment Bill
3rd December 2020
Following on from the consultation late last year the Australian Government has now introduced and given the first reading of the Designs Amendment (Advisory Council on Intellectual Property Response) Bill 2020 .
Read more
Small Differences from Prior Art Can Be Inventive
26th November 2020
In Lonza NZ Limited v Koppers Performance Chemicals New Zealand 2020 NZIPOPAT 4 the Assistant Commissioner confirmed that close prior art is not sufficient for a finding of obviousness.
Read more